The Minister of Work and former Governor of Ebonyi State, David Umahi, on Saturday, responded to the criticism of Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, over his recent remark on the cost per kilometre of the Lagos-Calabar Coaster Highway.
Speaking during an inspection tour of the Keffi Bridge and the Nasarawa-Toto Road projects, Umahi, who was accompanied by Governor Abdullahi Sule, noted that Governor Makinde misconstrued the technical details of the road project and cost evaluation.
According to the Minister, the cost of the highway had been carefully documented in line with global engineering standards and should not result in “political soundbites.”
Saturday Telegraph had earlier reported that Makinde had criticised the Minister’s estimated figures on the cost per kilometre of the Lagos-Calabar Coaster Highway, which is one of the key infrastructure projects of President Bola Tinubu’s administration.
Makinde, at an event on Friday, said that there was no need for the Minister of Works to be “dancing around the cost” of the project.
READ ALSO
- Abuja–Keffi Road: Works Minister Orders Contractor To Work AT Night
- A Leader Of Distinction: David Umahi’s Legacy Continues To Inspire
- David Umahi Varsity Expels 14 Students, Matriculates 1044
He said, “These are elementary questions. And it makes no sense (sic). A process is ongoing, payment has been made, and you are saying, ‘How has this money been utilised?. The money is meant for the project, and it will be paid according to the work done.
Reacting to the comment, the Work Minister described Makinde as “A brother and friend” but said it was improper for him to publicly accuse him of “dancing around” figures.
“I heard that my brother and friend, Governor Makinde, said something about the cost per kilometre. I don’t want to join issues with him,” Umahi said. “I think he is an engineer, while I am an electrical engineer; they call us ‘elect-elect’. But this road construction matter, ‘elect-elect no reach there’.
“I am his senior both in governance and in engineering practice. So, anything he doesn’t understand, he should call me and ask. I have great respect for him as my friend and brother, but he should withdraw the statement that I’m dancing around.
“I never danced around. If he insists, he should come for a debate, which is very important.”
Giving further details on the project, Umahi explained that there was no ambiguity in determining the cost per kilometre, buttressing that it must be understood in both estimated and average terms.
“There is no ambiguity in cost per kilometre,” he said. “I am teaching them that cost per kilometre can be divided into estimated cost, which has elements of variance, and average cost, which is definitive. The average cost of a definitive project and the estimated cost are probable elements.”
He noted that the estimated cost comprises allowances for contingencies and variation of price, which may not eventually be utilised.
“When the project is completed, and you remove what you didn’t use, such as contingencies and VOP, then you have your actual cost,” he stated.
“When somebody who is dangling without knowledge goes to ask AI what the difference is between cost per kilometre and average cost, I’m happy that AI told him exactly what I said,” the minister quipped.
Umahi made reference to the National Universities Commission’s clarification on who qualifies as a professor, noting that practical experience in the field also counts as expertise.
“I’m happy that the NUC programme on who is a professor also made me right. You can become a professor by the reason of your practice. And I think God has made me one when it comes to practical, field engineering programmes, that’s what it is; you can’t take it back,” Umahi stated.
